Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home2/redcavel/public_html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/operations.class.php on line 2364

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home2/redcavel/public_html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/operations.class.php on line 2368

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home2/redcavel/public_html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/output.class.php on line 3169

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/redcavel/public_html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/operations.class.php:2364) in /home2/redcavel/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
data management – Red Cave Consulting https://redcavelegal.com Red Cave Law Firm Consulting provides subscription-based business management consulting specifically designed for lawyers and law firms. Thu, 09 Nov 2017 03:24:12 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://redcavelegal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/cropped-Final-Logo-32x32.png data management – Red Cave Consulting https://redcavelegal.com 32 32 208994856 Both Sides Now: Cloud Services End Internal Law Firm Debates Over Mac vs PC https://redcavelegal.com/2016/12/09/both-sides-now-cloud-services-end-internal-law-firm-debates-over-mac-vs-pc/ Fri, 09 Dec 2016 18:40:13 +0000 //redcavelegal.com/?p=1403

There is still some discussion over whether law firms can efficiently accommodate both Mac and PC users.  I’m not sure why.  To my mind, that one’s been solved.

Back in the day (like five years ago, not the 1880s), it was far more difficult to absorb Mac users into what were, traditionally, PC-based law firms.  Law firms would run Parallels, or contrive clunky information-shifting and -sharing architectures, any of which everyone hated.  Frustration did abound.

However, the ascendancy of the cloud has essentially made hardware choice irrelevant, or eliminated some of those choices entirely.  Cloud services are, at base, device-agnostic.  Because those services operate via the internet, it doesn’t matter what device you’re using to access them, so long as you have internet access.  Beyond even the question of Mac versus PC, it doesn’t matter that you decide to use a tablet instead, of whatever brand.  The same goes for smartphones, since relevant cloud softwares will feature mobile applications built for iOS and Android.  (Nobody has a Windows Phone anymore, right?)  What that means is that your law firm could be all Mac or all PC or whatever combination thereof you want, and if you’re using cloud software exclusively, everyone will be accessing the same programs, featuring the same data, in the same way.

Mac versus PC, then, only remains an issue for law firms that maintain a dedication to premise-based software.  Of course, it’s easier than ever before to ditch premise-based software, as even companies that made their bones selling premise-based software are moving to create cloud versions or (less effectively) online access portals for their software.  While there are some software types for which improved cloud options for lawyers would be helpful (I’m thinking, immediately, of document assembly), at a very basic level, a law firm could adopt a cloud-based case management system, and deposit the majority of relevant law firm data there, at a shared and easily-accessible (by approved parties) repository — via whichever hardware those parties choose to access that data.

The adoption of a cloud-based technology infrastructure means that law firms can bury the Mac versus PC debate forever, and focus on more important things — like data security in a BYOD culture.

Of course, that doesn’t mean that your Mac-using friends won’t still try to convert you.

Liner Notes

Personally, I use a PC; but, what the hell . . .

Mack the Knife’ by Bobby Darin

]]>
1403
Area 51: How To Restrict Law Firm Data https://redcavelegal.com/2016/11/21/how-to-restrict-law-firm-data/ Mon, 21 Nov 2016 02:26:09 +0000 //redcavelegal.com/?p=1394 Sure, I believe in aliensI love ‘The X-Files’.  I’ve even been to Roswell.

But, you know what’s alien to a not insignificant number of small law firms?  Effective data controls.

To that end, I intend to examine three potential security loopholes, and then the methods to close them.

Logging In.  There are a number of ways you may be failing to properly secure your hardware and software — the chief access points for the majority of your law firm data.  The good news (if this is bad news for you) is that tweaking some of your existing protocols can go a long way to beefing up your existing protections against data breach.  The most obvious method is to create more secure passwords, and require your team to do the same.  People use simplistic passwords because they’re easy to remember; but, those same passwords are easy to crack.  Many lawyers operate on the thesis that, if one simple password is easy to remember for one program or device, then that same simple password will be similarly easy to remember across multiple programs and devices.  If you’re using the same password across a number of programs and devices, you’re exposing a large swath of your data in what would otherwise be a single, controlled breach — there’s a reason jailors have massive key rings and for each cell being tied to a single key.  If you’re having trouble remembering the multitudes of passwords you must recall, try a password managerThis is a good guide for crafting more complex passwords which don’t, by the way, have to include a bunch of special characters.  Beyond passwords, adding a second factor of authentication, where available, will better secure your accounts.  The most common second factor (in addition to a password) is a texted access code.  The theory behind this measure is that, even if a hacker does figure out your password, that same hacker is not very likely to also possess your phone — though, there are potentially stronger options available.

Screening.  Controlling access to internal systems is also important, especially given the rising use of case management programs by law firms.  While this is often an issue viewed through the prism of ethics, there are other concerns at play, as well.  A driving theory behind data management is that access should be given to those who require it to perform a job, to the exclusion of others.   Limiting engagement on matters only to those who need to access those matters limits the possibility of breach by limiting the number of parties who could easily effectuate it.  Reducing associate access to only those matters on which associates are directly working offers less exposure to your complete client lists and contacts, which would otherwise be more easily accessible by a break-off firm.  Effectively screening support staff from accounting features and reports could save you from becoming the victim of embezzlement.  It may go without saying that eliminating access for departing staff as soon as practicable is a protective measure that law firms would be negligent in waiting on employing.

Let’s Get Physical.  Even at this late date, most law firms are not entirely paperless, such that access controls should extend to the paper files that law firms maintain — even where there exist a limited number of those files.  Paper files are not subject to global exposure, like electronic data is; but, paper files are far easier to remove from a physical space, and are much harder to track if lost, mislaid or stolen.  Lawyers tend to leave paper files that they work on out on their desks.  Those documents are prime targets for being swiped; so, file all your paper documents before going home for the night.  Use file cabinets that lock, and actually lock them.   Make sure that associates and staff are aware of the need for securing confidential paper-based data, too; create a policy respecting the firm’s treatment of such documents.

It’s easy to overlook information security — until you’ve had a breach.  Not every breach is preventable; but, if you can stop those that are, and install a response and recovery plan for those that aren’t, you will have shown your commitment to your clients, and will have met your ethical and legal obligations.

. . .

Liner Notes

Speaking of aliens . . .

David Duchovny’ by Bree Sharp

Shout out to my boy, Glenn Dennis.

]]>
1394